Is Hollywood only capable of rehashing old stories or should I say previously made movies. Yes I believe some movies can be remade and maybe they will be better but at some point the Movie Big Wigs need to give their collective heads a shake and start hiring writers that can come up with original ideas. It is not that every movie is a remake but it is surprising how many movies are remakes. So I figured over the next couple of weeks or more I would look at the movies in my collection as well as some of the movies I have seen lately. seems that the choices that are made as to which movies
From my collection we have The Manchurian Candidate which was a originally made in 1962 with Frank Sinatra and Lawrence Harvey as Sgt Raymond Shaw. The premise is Raymond Shaw is a war hero from Korea whose Father has political aspirations and will use his son the hero to further those aspirations. Frank Sinatra plays his former commanding officer Ben Marco, from Korea who is experiencing nightmares about their time in Korea. As the story develops we see that Raymond Shaw is not what he seems and the nightmares that Ben Marco is experiencing maybe the key.
The remake made in 2004 started Denzel Washington on the role of Ben Marco and Liev Schreiber as Raymond Shaw. Sam premise except this time the army unit was in Kuwalt. The Raymond Shaw character is the one with political aspirations or should I say it is his Mother who is pulling the strings. As in the original there is an underlying conspiracy which follows a develops as Raymond Shaw gets closer to the White House.
If you haven’t seen the movie and do not want to spoil it do not highlight below.
Which is better? Well I enjoyed the story of both I especially liked the original story as well as the acting of both Frank Sinatra and Lawrence Harvey. The buildup was believable and the ending made sense. In the remake their were too many wild angles which just seemed too far fetched and took away from the central premise. The ending was predictable and was not well developed. While I like Denzel Washington I did not think he was at full capacity in this role.
In this case the original was better than the remake.

8 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://www.corruptinc.com/2006/03/19/what-is-the-deal-with-hollywood-movie-remakes/trackback
Monday, March 20, 2006 at 11:24
Chris Duncan
I came to the conclusion a long time ago that Hollywood is full of lazy, ‘get rich quick’, money-grabbing cretins. If you see anything vaguely original coming out of a major Hollywood studio, it probably slipped through the net by mistake.
Monday, March 20, 2006 at 7:07
Joey
You know, I agree with you. More often than not, the originals are better. I really think Hollywood’s golden days are over - hopefully there will be some sort of renaissance. Today’s actors, actresses can’t hold a candle to some of the greats. There are a couple, though, who ARE incredible - Denzel’s certainly one of ‘em.
Tuesday, March 21, 2006 at 8:07
Dariana
Ooooh, you are so right! It makes me wonder about the writers and directors these days. Are they so brain dead they can’t come up with anything new.
Happy BlogMad surfing and thanks for commenting at my blog. You have a great one here. I love the random photo.
Dari
Tuesday, March 21, 2006 at 1:32
Jim
The idea of a remake is appealing to Hollywood because there’s a built-in audience: those that saw the original movie and want to see what can be done with the story using updated special effects and today’s actors. Add to that the regular people who never saw the original and will be attracted by “the buzz” and ads, and you have a higher turnout than for something original and untried.
Tuesday, March 21, 2006 at 4:02
Anthony
I agree that Hollywood likes the formula because it is easy and they don’t have to put their necks on the line by floating new original stories. In most cases it is a lazy attempt at a money grab. The writing, acting and directing by and large cannot measure up to the original. There are a few times when the update is better than the original but these are rare.
Thursday, March 23, 2006 at 6:12
Karen Rani
Argh! This one of my pet peeves too! They need some new ideas, that is for sure!
Thursday, March 23, 2006 at 9:21
Anthony
I think they are afraid to try new things as movies are such big business, they need to get back to making movies at a reasonable cost so the investmnt is not so bad if they are a public failure. Also there is so much crap being made into movies that I think they need some sure fire movies to pay for the crap they make.
Thursday, March 23, 2006 at 6:49
evelgal
That is so true! I prefer old movies, they were original and need no special hi tech effects to move the audience in tremendous ways. luv your observations.